Generally awesome food guy Alton Brown has a dramatic reimagining (I can only hope, because otherwise it’s crazy how prepared his camera crew was) of how he came to conquer unsquirtable mustards.
If you don’t want to watch the entire two minutes of intensely acted refrigerator revelations, it’s simple: Take an egg carton (remove eggs first, obviously) and cut off the top, leaving only the scooped out egg cradles.
Set that in your fridge door’s shelf and stand various mustards or other condiments upright in it and voila — the next time you need a squirt it won’t be such a chore. My mind isn’t blown and my life has remained fairly the same since this knowledge was first revealed to me, but I am jonesing for a hot dog.
Usually, we try to stay at the forefront of Grocery Shrink Ray news, letting you know when we learn that a company has reduced the size of a product while keeping the price the same. Frito-Lay has been rolling out a massive shrinkage of Sun Chips, zapping bags from 10.5 ounces to only 7 ounces. Removing a third of the chips by weight? Noooo!
It doesn’t seem that long ago that we were bemoaning the shrink-rayage of Frito-Lay’s Sun Chips from 11.5 ounces to 10.5 ounces. Turns out it was six years ago. This time, the change is dramatic, and the brand has a Facebook page where customers can rant about the change.
It’s not like Americans need large quantities of corn chips laden with salt and flavoring powder. We’d probably be better off not eating them at all. While such a dramatic decrease is probably better for our health, but any Shrink Rayage makes us sad.
We contacted Frito-Lay to confirm this shrinkage, but they didn’t get back to us. They have been asking customers who complain about the difference to call their customer service line, where they will presumably receive coupons that don’t make up for losing a quarter of the chips in each bag.
Staples has been selling traditional mail services and products at 82 of its stores since November in a “pilot project” scheduled through September. But the union says the USPS is going to expand that project to 1,500 nationwide, reports CNNMoney.
And because those mini post offices are manned by lower-wage Staples staff instead of USPS workers, well that’s taking away work from the union, a move that could be a step toward privatization of the USPS and lead to more standalone post offices getting closed down.
“The protest is very important because the Staples deal is a direct attack on not just our members, but the American public,” said Jonathan Smith, president of the the local New York City chapter of the union.
The unions involved in the planned protests note an internal USPS memo citing the the purpose of the pilot program as evidence: “to determine if lower costs can be realized with retail partner labor” means cutting staff at traditional post office windows.
“This isn’t just about postal jobs,” said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. “Many people are outraged that a tremendous public asset is being turned over to a struggling private company.”
The USPS says the mini post offices aren’t meant to replace traditional offices, just that it’s trying to “grow the business” and that retail partners have “never been an earmark to pave a way to privatization,” a spokeswoman said.
Anything to make a buck is likely going to be on the table for the USPS, which lost $5 billion in the last fiscal year, just one of its recent money-leaking years.
Postal workers to protest at Staples [CNNMoney]
Reuters reports that FCC Chair Tom “Hot Wheels” Wheeler plans to begin circulating his proposal for the new neutrality rules to his colleagues tomorrow, and the five FCC commissioners are scheduled to vote on whether to move forward with the proposal on May 15.
That would be followed by a public comment period and any revisions that come out of those suggestions, so it’s still quite some time before any neutrality rules can be resurrected.
The largest ISPs, including Verizon, have all pinky-sweared that they will continue to abide by the old neutrality rules pending the finalizing of (and possible legal challenge to) the new rules, which makes one wonder why Verizon spent untold millions fighting the rules. Maybe Big V is just a free spirit who won’t be held down by the man… or something.
Only Comcast is legally obliged to follow the now-gutted guidelines; a stipulation the company agreed to while seeking approval of its merger with NBC Universal. However, Comcast’s obligation only lasts through 2018 (though we expect it will “volunteer” to continue that obligation if it helps grease the approval of its merger with Time Warner Cable.
No one knows if Wheeler’s proposal will be any different at its core than the former rules, as the appeals court didn’t take issue with the idea of enforced net neutrality; it just believed that, under the FCC’s outdated classification of ISPs, the commission didn’t have the proper authority to issue these rules.
Some believe that the FCC could simply reclassifying ISP as telecommunications infrastructure (as opposed to their current classification as content), effectively giving itself the authority to reinstate those the old rules.
In February, Wheeler issued a very vague outline of his plan, but even that didn’t say whether or not he intended to reclassify broadband.
One issue that will almost definitely not be dealt with in the new rules is the currently controversial topics of interconnectivity and paid peering. This issue has been brought to the fore by Netflix’s ongoing staring contests with various ISPs and its recent agreement to pay Comcast for more direct access to end-users.
The former net neutrality rules only dealt with an ISPs interactions with delivering content to the user. They prevented ISPs from actively slowing down or prioritizing content at whim. What they didn’t do was tell ISPs that they had to do everything possible to make sure that content providers’ data was getting to users without any speed bumps.
So when large numbers of users are simultaneously streaming Netflix — the biggest single source of downstream data in the U.S. — and connections begin to back up, ISPs have two choices: Open up more connections to ease the bottleneck or continue to let it build up and hope that Netflix pays them for a better connection.
To some, allowing these logjams to occur is a net neutrality issue — especially with regard to Netflix, as it provides a competing service to the pay-TV and on-demand content available from the cable companies that control most of the wired broadband in the country.
But earlier this month, Wheeler’s office made it clear that while the Chair believes interconnectivity is indeed an FCC issue, it is not a neutrality issue, and thus will not be part of his proposed rules.
After months of searching for a home, going through the process of applying for a mortgage, providing support for every speck of dust in your piggy bank (often multiple times), you finally get to closing day, where you’re often rushed through hundreds of papers of documents you’ve never seen before, hoping that you’re not inadvertently signing away your firstborn. Isn’t there something that can be done to make the closing process less daunting and more transparent?
A new report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau outlines problems in the current process and suggests an alternative in the form of a new Electronic Closing pilot project.
The report [PDF], “Mortgage Closings Today”, highlights the frustrations consumers have encountered when completing the mortgage portion of their new purchase and just how technology could ease some of those burdens.
“Mortgage closings are often fraught with anxiety,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray says in a news release. “We have taken action to address some of the problems consumers face, but more needs to be done.”
The key challenges that consumers and industry stakeholders reported there was not enough time to review closing paperwork, the paperwork often proves overwhelming and the documents often contain jargon not easily understood by consumers.
In many instances, consumers reported they were unable to see the closing package until they arrived at the closing table. This proved too late to digest the information, ask questions about changes in fees, or correct errors, without delaying the closing. Additionally, consumers felt there was a disconnect between themselves and key participants in the process.
The CFPB report points to two root causes behind consumer’s feelings of stress and confusion in the closing process: large, complex packages and inconsistent closing practices across transactions.
Of the responses received by the Bureau in their research regarding closing practices, nearly 33% of all stakeholders stated that documents were too large. Consumers described the process as tedious and stressful when trying to figure out where to sign, while others had to slow down the settlement agents in order to have them explain the paperwork sufficiently.
In an attempt to lessen the frustrations that consumers encounter when going through the mortgage closing process, CFPB has identified “a more streamlined, efficient, and educational closing process that would be beneficial to consumers” in the in the form of a Electronic Closing system.
eClosings are already happening in the market today, but adoption is low, CFPB reports. A pilot program is set to launch later this year and is designed to enable the Bureau to better understand the role eClosing can play in the mortgage process.
The implementation of an eClosing system could address challenges by shifting the experience toward a paperless process. The CFPB believes that eClosing solutions could provide increased flexibility to provide documents prior to the closing and could include embedded educational tools that would highlight key information or link to additional resources. Additionally, consumers could utilize eClosing to access an eVault that would house their previous documents.
While some consumers reported encountering errors in their information during the closing process, CFPB contends that eClosing could help such errors be spotted before closing takes place.
The new report and pilot program have been designed to promote best partitives in the marketplace ahead of the CFPB’s “Know Before You Owe” mortgage initiative. The initiative was designed to improve the home-buying experience for consumers by requiring new, raiser-to-read disclosure forms that lay out the terms of a mortgage to a homebuyer. The new rule is expected to be implemented in August 2015.
CFPB Report Highlights Pain Points for Consumers in Mortgage Closing Process [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]
After Consumerist played a large role in getting the Fitbit Force recalled, I set up a Google alert to let me know when news about the product hits the Interweb. Since the official recall almost six weeks ago, I sort of expected to see a decrease in mentions of the product. I didn’t expect to see sales listings from a small, disingenuous Fitbit Force black market.
In the United States, it’s illegal to sell or resell an item that has been recalled. That isn’t stopping vendors all over the country. Not all of them are profiteering or ignoring the law on purpose.
We had thought that this recall was widely publicized, but apparently not widely publicized enough. I was disturbed (but not surprised) to see listings well above the product’s original $130 list price, just like there was during Fitbit’s voluntary recall period before the CPSC was involved.
Some of the listings did mention that the product was no longer available in stores, but didn’t mention why. I was horrified at the idea that an unknowing customer might drop $200 on something that has at least a 2% chance of giving them a nasty rash. It was time to take consumer protection to the streets. Well, Craigslist, and my Gmail account.
One sale listing that crossed my inbox from somewhere in the southern United States was a person who said that he no longer wanted the device, and was selling it for $100. He asked potential buyers to text him, so I did. Here’s a lightly edited transcript of our conversation (thanks, Google Voice!)
Consumerist: Are you aware that it’s illegal to sell items that were recalled for safety reasons, like the Fitbit Force?
Seller: I didn’t know there was a recall
Seller: Can I get my money back?
Seller: What was the recall?
Consumerist: They were recalled because they caused really bad contact dermatitis in some users. You can return it to the company for a full refund.
Seller: I haven’t received any notice from fitbit and it is registered with them.
Seller: Wow, thanks
Seller: I’ll get right on it
Consumerist: They sent out an e-mail that a lot of people may have overlooked and mistook as spam.
Seller: Must [have gone] to spam
Seller: It hasn’t bothered me any
I passed along the phone number to call Fitbit, and ten minutes later received a text back. The seller (who later mentioned being an occasional Consumerist reader) would be getting a $140 refund. He had already taken down the Craigslist post.
Seller: Well, thanks. I’ll get more than I was asking for it.
One person in the Northeast listed theirs for $170, and also seemed surprised to hear about the recall. He explained that he had noticed others for sale on Craigslist above the original retail price, but didn’t question why: he just thought he would sell his, too. This person thanked me for the note, and took their listing down.
Another seller in the Northeast also claimed not to know about the recall either, and had the device listed for $200. (Remember, the original price was $130 plus tax.) The person claimed to have bought it around the time that the product was recalled, and it had been used for only a few weeks. The seller thanked me for letting them know, then didn’t take the post down.
There are Fitbit flippers out there as well, who offer to ship them anywhere and boast that they have more in stock. These people surely must know why the wristband is off the market. Does the now-recalled product have some cachet or badass cred now? Is that it?
This year wedding guests will spend about $592 on average on each wedding, which again is a huge jump from just two years ago, according to a new American Express survey of 1,500 Americans, reports MarketWatch.
Of course, if you can cut corners between any pre-wedding parties, transportation, hotels or personal grooming, you’ll save a bunch. But that cost per wedding doesn’t even factor in the price of the gift, so there’s that.
“Americans are getting more comfortable with having an expensive wedding, which does put the onus on guests to spend more too,” says David Rabkin, senior vice president of consumer lending at American Express.
Because this story is clearly all about me and how I deal with the fact that everyone I know plans awesome weddings and invites me to them, instead of the anecdotal evidence given by my fellow weddinger cited by MarketWatch, I will just say I’ve got invitations to nuptials in New York, New Jersey, Montana, Ohio, Napa Valley and Austin this year alone.
There comes a time when you’ve just got to say no, but if you do check “yes” and start shaking that piggy bank, know that couples spent $220 per guest on food and entertainment last year, an 8% increase forom the $204 they spent in 2012, according to TheKnot.com’s national survey of 13,000 brides.
Because goodness knows if I’ve spent money on a dress, a bachelorette party, a bridal shower, a gift, a flight and a hotel room, well, I’m going to want a nice cut of steak, the best piece of cake money can buy and an open bar with very generous hours. I haven’t been disappointed yet.
Cost of attending weddings soars 75% [MarketWatch]
The new section of the VA’s eBenefits site was announced today by First Lady Michelle Obama at a veterans jobs summit at Fort Campbell on the border of Kentucky and Tennessee.
The VA’s Employment Center aims to help out the anywhere from 700,000 to 800,000 armed forces veterans who are looking for a job at any given time, by not only allowing them to post their resumes and sort through job listings. It also provides functionalities like a resume-builder and a Military Skills Translator that can show the job-seekers how their particular skill sets can be used in non-military employment.
This was a point the First Lady mentioned in her talk with soldiers at the Fort Campbell job summit — don’t minimize the things you learned while in service to your country.
“If you want a job, you can’t be modest about your qualifications,” she explained. “Anyone out there would be lucky to have you on their team.”
Likewise, employers who use the database to find job candidates have access to a translator that works in the opposite direction, telling them what types of military training would be applicable to their business.
That fake wolf of a phone call will cost an Ohio man $489,000 after officials near Cleveland unleashed a massive U.S. Coast Guard search and rescue mission on Lake Erie, a U.S. appeals court ruled, according to Reuters.
Two years ago, the now 21-year-old licensed pilot told authorities he saw what he thought was a distress flare coming up from a boat as he flew over the lake.
And then when Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport asked him to get a closer look, he said he didn’t see boat but did see more flares and fishing boat with four people on it wearingn life jackets and flashing lights.
When a 21-hour search with a 140-foot U.S. Coast Guard cutter, three smaller rescue boats, a rescue helicopter and a Canadian CC130 Hercules airplane came up empty, the man finally confessed a month later to making it all up.
He pleaded guilty to making a false distress call and was sentenced to serve three months in jail and pay restitution of $277,000 to the U.S. Coast Guard and $212,000 to the Canadian Armed Forces. His lawyers claimed he wasn’t liable for the Canadian costs and only the coast guard’s direct costs of $118,000, but the appeals court upheld the previous ruling.
So remember folks, when you’re bored and flying your plane, it might seem like a fun(?) idea to pretend someone is in danger, but resist the temptation. It’s expensive and it’s a waste of everyone’s time.
While sure, I can eat cheddar infused with flakes of 24K gold (that’s not even a challenge, show me a piece of cheese and I will likely eat it regardless), I’d rather have $100 worth of delicious ingredients that are wholly edible all on their own if I’m going to diverge from a homemade $2 basic sandwich.
So the fact that there’s now a $1,000 ice cream sundae on the menu of a trendy Meatpacking District restaurant in New York City made me immediately skeptical. What kind of cows produce such pricy milk? is this sundae filling a swimming pool and if so can I swim in it while a bearded Ryan Gosling fans me with a palm leaf and sings sweet songs about my Wisconsin homeland?
But no, explains Eater NY, Bagatelle’s pricy dessert is really only half as expensive as it purports to be when you take away the part of the menu item YOU CAN’T EAT.
The “Mauboussin Mega Sundae” has scoops of vanilla ice cream and Dom Perignon Rose sorbet, with a topping of chocolate truffles, macarons, whipped cream, chocolate vodka sauce, and “gilded brownies,” and of course, more gold leaf because that’s how you jack the price on anything.
But $530 of that sundae can be chalked up to a ring made of black steel and white gold which isn’t even the cherry on top or placed in the food (choking hazards probably, you know how it goes) but instead is served alongside.
Which makes it much like the $70 grilled cheese with its $30 side of mac and cheese.
I can chuckle over your priciness, expensive foods that are really masquerading as joint food + inedible offerings, but that doesn’t mean I respect you. Next time show me $1,000 worth of ice cream and toppings and leave that crunchy ring where it belongs, in a jewelry store.
You can follow MBQ on Twitter if you also eschew eating precious metals with your dairy: @marybethquirk
In a perfect world, once a customer has completed a mobile phone contract or paid the full unsubsidized cost of their device, they should be able to take that device to any carrier of their choice. While carriers will adopt voluntary standards next year, that’s next year. Sprint wants consumers to know that you won’t be able to unlock any devices you get from them for use on any domestic networks until the standards go into effect on February 11, 2015.
While the industry’s voluntary standards bring us a little closer to that perfect world, we aren’t quite there yet.
Carriers had to adopt at least three (any three) out of the six standards this spring. One of those standards is that carriers have to make their unlocking policy clear to consumers. Even if that policy is, for now, “nope.” That’s why Sprint has published a clear new policy on their site. That policy: you’ll be able to unlock your device and flee Sprint sometime in 2017, because they don’t sell any phones that will work with other domestic carriers yet.
Specifically, devices manufactured with a SIM slot within the past three years (including, but not limited to, all Apple iPhone devices), cannot be unlocked to accept a different domestic carrier’s SIM for use on another domestic carrier’s network. Sprint has no technological process available to do this.
We were going to bold the more ridiculous passages for emphasis, but that would have been the entire excerpt. No, there is no technological process for unlocking phones, because Sprint didn’t design one into phones to be used on their network.
Newer dual-band phones can be unlocked for use on foreign GSM carriers, though. We have multiple GSM carriers in the United States: AT&T, T-Mobile, and virtual network operators including Straight Talk that lease capacity from other carriers. There’s no reason why Sprint doesn’t have a “technological process” to allow customers who are no longer under contract to use their phones on other carriers except that Sprint didn’t want that “technological process” to be available.
While it’s not exactly a case for Adrian Monk (or even Encyclopedia Brown), police in Bismarck, ND, do have a puzzler of a crime on their hands after someone broke into a restaurant after hours and appears to have done nothing but walked around the place with a cardboard box covering his/her head.
As you can see from the above video [via Eater], while this is definitely a case of breaking and entering — the owner says the damage to the shattered front door is around $1,000 — the B&E artist seems to just make a circuit of the restaurant (again, while sporting a box over their head) without doing any further damage. The owner also says that nothing appears to have been stolen by the Box-Headed Bandit.
Using our detective skills honed by watching the occasional episode of NCIS (or is CSI?) while doing the dishes, we came up with the following theories:
1. It’s a restaurant employee who accidentally left behind his/her lucky rabbit’s foot and couldn’t get to sleep without it. The criminal had obvious inside knowledge of where to score an empty cardboard box and seems to move effortlessly through the building (as effortlessly as one can with a box on their head), indicating foreknowledge of the layout.
2. The restaurant could be a secret front for an international crime ring that involves drug cartels and multinational manufacturing/fast food conglomerates. The person under the box is a quick-thinking (but hot-tempered) high school chemistry teacher with nothing to lose (and a son who really, really loves breakfast). He obviously entered the restaurant to make off with incriminating evidence against the restaurant’s owner, who hides his involvement in the crime syndicate by donating to the local DEA Fun Run.
3. It was all an accident. In a hilarious confluence of events, a person with nothing better to do was filling a cardboard box with rubber cement while sitting on their fire escape while an unwitting pedestrian was walking down the street minding their own business. Something distracts the box-gluer and his “art project” falls four stories onto the pedestrian’s head. The pedestrian, blinded by the combination of box and rubber cement, stumbles into the restaurant and wanders around aimlessly until finding his way back out to the street.
4. Stupid drunk guy who thought there might be money in the cash register.
According to Bloomberg, Dish has been telling the networks that it is targeting a late summer start for the online TV option, which would be separate from its current satellite TV service.
The ground was laid for the service earlier this year when Dish and Disney announced a deal that would limit Dish subscribers’ ability to auto-skip ads on Disney-owned ABC programming in exchange for online streaming rights to Disney properties. In addition to ABC and the Disney-branded networks, the company owns several other cable channels, most notably the ESPN slate of sports programming.
Getting Disney on board was key, as it provides at least the impression of stability. Other, smaller content providers are reportedly demanding that Dish make deals with at least two of the big four broadcast networks before they will sign on.
CBS, which has sued Dish over its ad-skipping DVR, may not be an easy sell, but Comcast-owned NBC could be the next network to sign on. When Comcast purchased NBC, it promised regulators to provide comparable programming “on terms that are economically equivalent” to those of its competition. So what needs to be hammered out is what would be an equivalent amount for to Dish to pay Comcast for a slate of channels comparable to what it’s getting from Disney.
Comcast may also be pushed to make a deal as it would help to give the impression to regulators that the company welcomes competition in the pay-TV market.
We’re a bit skeptical of the late-summer start date, but look forward to eventually seeing what channels Dish will offer and what price it will charge. Additionally, with net neutrality still being rebuilt like the Bionic Man in a secret FCC lab under the Potomac River, will cable-owned ISPs flex their muscle to throttle a service that goes head to head with their service?
Here’s how it went down: A New York City cardiologist shared a corporate credit card with his father, who one day noticed about $135,000 in charges at a strip club, spread over four nights in a 10-day period, reports the New York Daily News.
That’s when Cardiologist Jr. said he had never stepped inside the strip club, but if he did, well then, he must have been drugged, court papers say. Yes, drugged four different times.
“He was coherent until he saw the bill,” joked the club’s manager.
The club is now suing the repeat customer for stiffing the joint, saying he “voluntarily came to plaintiff’s place of business and requested that plaintiff provide him with food, beverages and services.”
But when Cardiologist Jr. saw the bills, he “contested the charges alleging that he was drugged by plaintiff’s employees and thus did not authorize the charges and/or he was not at plaintiff’s place of business on the aforesaid dates.”
The club says it has him on video on all four dates in question, so it must just be the mysterious, villainous repeat drugger at work.
“We get a lot of very wealthy people here. You can run up a bill,” the club’s owner said, adding that it’s very rare for someone to not pay, however.
“He wanted to speed up his route,” the city police captain who arrested him last year in a western Kentucky town tells The Courier-Journal. “I think he was lazy.”
The mail carrier had been working for five years when he was arrested on a tip from the owner of the storage facility where he was stashing much of the mail. The owner saw crates inside labeled “U.S. Posal Service” and called both the cops and the postmaster.
Police first found mail in his mother’s house and said that the man insisted that was the only mail he stashed, when that wasn’t true. Officials also said he destroyed about 1,000 additional pieces — most of which were advertising circulars.
But his lawyer said the man was going through a divorce, had kids to take care of and would simply “store” his mail if he couldn’t finish delivering it.
“It’s not that he was stealing anything from it,” his lawyer said, pointing out that that’s just a small part of the 1.2 million pieces he was responsible for. So… the odds are supposed to be in his favor?
For his two years of dumping and destroying mail, he was sentenced by the chief U.S. district judge to six months in jail as well as six months on home incarceration.
He would’ve likely gotten a two-year sentence under federal sentencing guidelines, but the judge said he didn’t steal from the mail and only a few of his 250 recipients on his route lost money. He’s also ordered to pay $14,808 in restitution to local residents, a bank and two other businesses for their losses.
A spokeswoman for the U.S. Postal Service, said, “We take the sanctity of the U.S. mail very seriously and the Postal Inspection Service and the Office of Inspector General prosecute to the fullest extent of the law anyone who violates that trust.”
And yes, everyone is calling this guy Newman, because:
Kentucky mailman hid mail in dead mom’s house [The Courier-Journal]
Do you remember Mrs. Tea? Launched in 1995, the Mrs. Tea machine was Mr. Coffee’s vaguely British counterpart, an automatic countertop brewing machine for loose-leaf tea. The device allowed for extra steeping time, and best of all, brewed into a classy-looking plain ceramic teapot. Mrs. Tea isn’t available to the tea snobs of today, though: she disappeared from the market sometime between 1998 and 1999.
At the time Mrs. Tea hit shelves, Mr. Coffee was part of the company Health O Meter, and their CEO just happened to be British. “There’s nothing wrong with making tea with a tea bag or making coffee the old fashioned way boiling it on the stove, but people like the convenience of the machines to do it for them,” he told the Associated Press in 1995.
Branding-wise, it isn’t clear who Mrs. Tea is. Was “Tea” her last name at birth, and when she married Mr. Coffee, she chose to keep her original last name? Is she Mr. Coffee’s sister, who married a Mr. Tea (not Mr. T) and then went into the family business? Are we putting too much thought into the naming conventions of hot beverage appliances? Yeah, probably.
The Tragic Story Of Mrs. Tea, Mr. Coffee’s Brand Companion [Trivia Happy]
The Wall Street Journal reports that GM has already sent out thousands of kits containing ignition switches, ignition cylinders and key sets to replace the defective switch that the car company had known about since 2001 — before the first of the recalled vehicles hit the road — but did nothing to fix until issuing the recall earlier this year.
Additionally, GM says it has mailed letters to the approximately 1.4 million owners of the various vehicles built before 2008 that had the defective switch installed from the get-go. The notices instruct the owners to contact a GM dealer to schedule the necessary repairs.
There is a second group about about 1 million owners who were later added to the recall because their vehicles might have the defective switch. GM failed to change the part number when it had the bad switch upgraded in 2007, meaning some of the defective parts may have been unwittingly used instead of the newer, safer switches.
Owners these vehicles will receive a letter in early May providing them with more information about whether or not they need to have their vehicles repaired.
According to Amazon, beginning on May 21, Prime subscribers will have access to:
• All seasons of: The Sopranos, The Wire, Deadwood, Rome and Six Feet Under, Eastbound & Down, Enlightened, Flight of the Conchords and others.
• HBO miniseries, including Angels in America, Band of Brothers, John Adams, The Pacific and Parade’s End
• Select seasons of some series, including Boardwalk Empire, Treme and True Blood
• A selection of HBO original movies, documentaries, and comedy specials
The biggest omission from the list is, obviously, Game of Thrones, the highly rated (for premium cable) fantasy series currently in its fourth season, which recently set a record for the largest swarm of BitTorrent users accessing a single pirated file at the same time.
Today’s announcement is a big departure for HBO, which in 2010 brushed off the idea of making its content available to anyone other than its own subscribers or those willing to pay for discs or digital downloads.
It may also take some of the wind out of the sails of those that had hoped for a stand-alone HBO Go service that would be made available to the public without requiring an HBO subscription. Though, if the deal proves profitable to HBO, perhaps it will eventually begin putting more of its newer shows on Prime, effectively turning the Amazon service into a sort-of stand-alone HBO Go.
Speaking of HBO Go, owners of the new Amazon Fire TV streaming video box thingy will also gain access to HBO Go, though they will obviously still be required to have a subscription to HBO Go (or have a friend willing to share their password).
Yesterday during a conference call about earnings, Thompson told reporters the company hasn’t seen any impact from the “most recent competitor” in the breakfast space, reports the Associated Press.
So he didn’t exactly say, “I’m not afraid of a waffle taco.” But he did go on to add that the company seems to have a new rival for breakfast food every year, whether they’re “sandwich shops or taco shops.”
He went on to explain the Mickey D’s difference — whereas Taco Bell uses frozen eggs that are thawed and cooked for its morning menu, McDonald’s uses real eggs. Well, most of the time — in some cases, stores do use frozen ingredients.
“We crack fresh eggs, we grill sausage and bacon, we bake biscuits and we toast muffins,” Thompson said, saying later that the point is that the fresh eggs are cooked in McDonald’s restaurants, saying, “It isn’t a microwave deal.”
When Taco Bell’s chief marketing officer Chris Brandt was told of Thompson’s comments, he simply replied, “Well, good for them.”
The burns and the zings! It’s just too much to keep track of. All over what you eat first in the morning.
McDonald’s CEO: No heat from breakfast competition [Associated Press]
Someone Cathy is close to is in the hospital with a shattered femur, which sounds extremely unpleasant. To cheer this person up, cathy sent some flowers through FTD. The flowers are pretty enough, but Cathy doesn’t think they’re what she ordered.
Here’s what she thought she had ordered, next to what showed up at the hospital:
Let’s look on the bright side, at least: the popularity of mobile phone photography means that you can snap a picture of a flower arrangement to confirm to the sender that you received it. If it’s very different from what was sent, the sender can go back to the florist, armed with the photo, and complain. We couldn’t do that twenty years ago: heck, I left undeveloped film on my camera for years at a time back then.
Back to Cathy’s FTD order, though. Florists do reserve the right to substitute in some flowers for others, but if Cathy had her heart set on white daisies, there aren’t any in this arrangement. The bright pink mums are there and are plentiful, but not open yet, which is a common reason why people complain to us about flowers. It’s better to receive blooms that aren’t open yet than to receive closed and dead ones.
When she complained, the mega-flower-aggregator had some homework for the recipient. “[FTD] needed to know the number of stems of each type of flower or else
there was nothing that they could do,” Cathy wrote to Consumerist. “I was not about to ask someone in the hospital with a shattered femur to go count the stems in the basket of flowers that I had sent her.”